您的位置：首页 > 新闻中心 > 社会 > 正文

盗墓笔记

上半年亏损或四千万爱丽家居凭什么13天12板？_我的网站

一 |

RALEIGH, N.C. – The 2024 election promises to feature several major battlegrounds, but for sheer breadth of competitive contests, North Carolina next year will be hard to beat.

It starts with the presidential race. Recent presidential contests in North Carolina have been close: In 2020, Donald Trump won North Carolina by about 74,000 votes out of more than 5.5 million cast. Experts expect a competitive race again in 2024.

In addition, a newly empowered GOP majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court is poised to redraw the congressional map to benefit Republicans, producing the possibility of competitive races.

Meanwhile, the parties will fiercely contest both chambers of the legislature, which the GOP currently controls by narrow supermajorities, thanks to a Democrat-to-Republican party-switcher in the state House earlier this year. That party switch, by state Rep. Tricia Cotham, now enables Republicans to enact a strongly conservative agenda over the vetoes of Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper if they wish.

Cooper, for his part, is term-limited, teeing up a knock-down, drag-out contest to succeed him, likely between Democratic Attorney General Josh Stein and Republican Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson.

And that isn’t it for falling dominoes: The decisions by Stein and Robinson to seek the governorship leave their old offices of attorney general and lieutenant governor up for grabs in 2024, joining the GOP-held offices of state treasurer and labor commissioner as open-seat contests. The Democratic-held offices of secretary of state and auditor and the Republican-held offices of schools superintendent, insurance commissioner and agriculture commissioner will also be contested in 2024, with varying degrees of competitiveness.

In other words, in 2024, North Carolina will be one of the centers of the political universe – important in part because it’s a uniquely competitive state.

“There’s no telling who will win in 2024, but I’d bet half-court tickets to the UNC-Duke game that it will be close and North Carolina will retain its title as the definition of ‘purple,’” says Chris Cooper, a Western Carolina University political scientist (and no relation to the governor).

In recent years, North Carolina has mostly hosted close statewide races. During the 2020 and 2022 elections, North Carolina held 16 federal and state races for statewide office – and no candidate in any of them won more than 54% of the vote.

In addition, unlike most states in this highly polarized age, North Carolina has elected a thorough mix of Democrats and Republicans to statewide executive offices, which suggests that voters in the state – or at least a crucial subset of them – are willing to split their tickets.

The Republicans have done best in Senate and presidential contests. In those races, the GOP has kept a consistent – if modest – edge. It’s been a decade and a half since a Democrat has won one of those races. The last to win were Kay Hagan for Senate and Barack Obama for president, both of them way back in 2008.

“North Carolina has proved to be a purple state, but not necessarily a swing state,” says Cooper, the political scientist. “The statewide outcomes have been among the closest in the country, but Republicans have found themselves just on the winning side of the razor’s edge for presidential and Senate elections.”

The most intriguing contrast one can draw for North Carolina is with one of its neighbors to the south. Could North Carolina follow Georgia’s path in voting blue for Senate and presidential elections?

For the better part of two decades, Georgia, like North Carolina, had voted consistently Republican in key federal races – until 2020. That year, Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock won uphill, and narrow, victories for Senate seats, while Biden was winning the state in the presidential race. In 2022, Warnock won another close election to a full six-year term.

In an era when urban areas have grown bluer by the year, Georgia has seen its major metro area – Atlanta – steadily move toward the Democrats. In 2000, metro Atlanta backed Republican George W. Bush by 4 points. By 2020, the Atlanta metro area backed Biden by 28 points, a whopping 32-point shift.

North Carolina’s biggest metro areas saw a similar pattern.

North Carolina’s Raleigh-Durham metro area backed Gore in 2000 by less than a point. Two decades later, Biden won it by 26 points. The state’s most populous county, Wake County (which includes Raleigh and Cary), favored Bush in 2000 by about a point, but backed Biden by 27.

Similar patterns held in the North Carolina portion of the Charlotte metro area. In 2000, Bush won the Charlotte metro area by 18 points. But by 2020, Biden won the region by 4 points – a 22-point shift. The state’s second largest county, Mecklenburg County (which includes Charlotte), voted for Bush by almost 3 points in 2000 but Biden by a massive 36 points.

Such shifts helped the Democrats narrow the statewide gap substantially in North Carolina. In 2000, Bush defeated Gore statewide by 13 points, whereas Trump defeated Biden by about 1 point.

But these shifts weren’t enough to tip the state to the Democrats in the presidential race. A big reason why: Raleigh-Durham and Charlotte don’t have as large a footprint in North Carolina as metro Atlanta does in Georgia.

In 2020, Atlanta’s metro counties accounted for just shy of a majority of votes cast in Georgia – 49%, up from 46% in 2000. So even as outlying Georgia was growing redder – backing Bush by 19 and Trump by 26 – Democrats were able to turn a 12-point statewide loss by Al Gore in 2000 into a narrow victory for Biden in 2020.

By contrast, the Raleigh-Durham and Charlotte metro areas account for a minority of the state’s voters, growing from 36% of the votes cast in 2000 to 42% in 2020.

In other words, in North Carolina, the Democratic gains in the two big metro areas were nearly canceled out by the large and growing GOP margins elsewhere.

“North Carolina has the second most rural voters in the country after Texas, so running up the score in Raleigh-Durham and Charlotte won't get you victory the way Atlanta does in Georgia,” says Cooper, the political scientist. “There’s been a massive Republican gain in rural areas”

Over the next quarter-century, Wake and Mecklenburg counties are projected to grow dramatically faster in population than most other North Carolina counties, according to calculations by the state’s Board of Science, Technology & Innovation. Over the long term, this could make the state bluer.

But for now, North Carolina’s political balance of power belongs in the hands of “countrypolitan" counties, a term coined by Mac McCorkle, a longtime North Carolina consultant who now teaches at Duke University's Sanford School of Public Policy, and Rachel Salzberg.

These 28 counties sit within the economic and commuting orbit of North Carolina’s metro areas, but they’re located on the outlying edge, and they lack the racial diversity, college attainment levels and higher incomes that increasingly align with voting Democratic.

By McCorkle’s and Salzberg’s calculations, “countrypolitan” counties backed Trump in 2020 by a gaping 63%-36% margin, and collectively they provided Trump with about 50% more raw votes than North Carolina’s 50 most rural counties did.

That’s a major reason why Republicans have remained modestly ahead in North Carolina, at least in high-profile federal races, experts say.

To do well in North Carolina, says Western Carolina’s Cooper, “Democrats don’t have to win the rural vote, but they have to avoid getting pummeled.”

This is the goal of Anderson Clayton, the newly installed head of the state Democratic Party. At 25, Clayton, an Appalachian State University graduate, is the youngest state Democratic chairman in the nation.

“One of the things that I think that I learned from being on national campaigns is that a lot of times the national party is not looking at rural places like they should be,” Anderson told an audience in Union County, according to The Washington Post. “They’re looking at it as a place of a problem. And for me, I got really frustrated with that. It was part of the thing that called me home.”

This advice doesn’t just hold for presidential and Senate races, political observers say. It will also help determine whether Democrats can stay competitive in North Carolina’s state-level offices or whether Republicans start running away with them.

Since the dawn of the 20th century, North Carolina has elected only three Republican governors – one for a term in the 1970s, one for two terms in the 1980s and 1990s, and one for a term in the 2010s.

Historically, the successful Democratic model for winning North Carolina gubernatorial races has been to nominate a candidate who can win in metro areas but who hails from less populated regions of the state and connects with voters there. A good example is the current governor, who helped his family farm tobacco while growing up.

But the pool of potential Democratic candidates from more rural areas “has dried up,” says Rob Schofield, the editor of the online publication NC Newsline. Lining up Democratic candidates to run everywhere, as Clayton seeks to do, will be challenging.

“That counts on people running even if they know they will lose and be sacrificed, which is a hard sell,” says Ferrel Guillory, an emeritus professor of political science at the University of North Carolina.

In any case, the likely 2024 Democratic gubernatorial nominee, Stein, is set to break his party’s historic mold. Stein, a former legislator who has won two terms as attorney general, grew up in Chapel Hill, home of the University of North Carolina, and earned his undergraduate degree from Dartmouth and a law degree and a master’s of public affairs from Harvard.

Meanwhile, Stein’s potential Republican opponent also represents departure from past Republican gubernatorial candidates, who have tended to be economic conservatives from metro areas: Robinson is an outspoken social conservative who has flirted with conspiracy theories, ranging from the moon landing to crisis actors in school shootings.

Robinson doesn’t have a clear path to the nomination. In the primary, he faces state Treasurer Dale Folwell, former Congressman Mark Walker, former legislator Andy Wells and retired health executive Jesse Thomas. But he’s considered the front-runner, due to a strong core of support in a state where, by law, 30% plus one is enough to win a primary.

If the race comes down to Stein and Robinson, as conventional wisdom suggests, “it will be an epic and titanic battle that will be bitterly divided and deeply polarizing,” says Michael Bitzer, a professor of politics and history at Catawba College. “Probably the most expensive gubernatorial race in the nation for next year, and it may break state records.”

One unknown for now is how the Republican supermajority flexes its expanded policy muscle.

After years of opposition, the GOP legislature in March passed legislation to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, and Cooper quickly signed it. But after Cotham’s party switch produced a supermajority, Republicans sidestepped Cooper’s veto and passed a 12-week abortion ban, which is being challenged in court.

Passage of the abortion ban could energize Democrats, as it has in other purple and even red states. This could be exacerbated if the GOP passes other laws popular with the party’s socially conservative base but unpopular among moderates. Robinson’s candidacy, too, risks scaring off Republican moderates.

“When the Republicans moved to find some way to accept Medicaid expansion, to me that reflected that, wow, these guys may be understanding their rough edges,” McCorkle says in an interview. “Then the abortion law happens and then Robinson happens. That could explode things.”

John Hood, president of the John William Pope Foundation, a grant-making foundation, says he believes Republicans in the legislature are “realistic.”

“They recognize that either Stein will be governor or Robinson will be governor, and they don’t trust either,” Hood says.

Ultimately, the noise from the presidential race, especially if Trump is the GOP nominee, could drown out everything else down-ballot.

“The national networks and media may be so consumed by the presidential election that state issues may not affect the public’s mind,” Guillory says.

。

　　中新网北京8月23日电(记者谢艺观)涨停的股票很多，但13个交易日斩获12个涨停板的并不多，爱丽家居算一个。

二 | 　　这家主营PVC弹性地板的企业，股价从7月21日启动，一路狂奔至18日的30元/股，累计涨幅超两倍，总市值一度膨胀至72.68亿元。　　而就在一个多月前，爱丽家居预告，预计2026年上半年实现归属于母公司所有者的净利润亏损3450万元至4050万元。　　业绩亏损却上演资本狂欢，爱丽家居凭什么受追捧？　　一则公告点燃资本热情　　这一切始于7月20日晚间的一则公告。　　彼时，爱丽家居宣布，拟筹划以自有和自筹现金方式收购不低于武汉欧康诺电子科技股份有限公司(以下简称“欧康诺”)股权总数的77.08%的股权，欧康诺100%股权的整体估值不超过人民币6.5亿元。收购完成后，欧康诺将成为爱丽家居控股子公司。爱丽家居公告截图。　　一个是做PVC弹性地板的传统制造企业，一个是做存储芯片测试设备的高科技公司，本是风马牛不相及的两家企业，却因一纸意向协议站上AI存储风口，并迅速点燃起资本市场的热情。　　7月21日，爱丽家居一字涨停。此后股价如脱缰野马，连续拉出涨停板。8月3日，爱丽家居首次因股票交易异常波动停牌核查，但复牌后继续涨停；8月11日，爱丽家居再度停牌，不过8月18日复牌后继续涨停。　　直到8月18日晚间，上交所通报，部分投资者在交易爱丽家居过程中存在影响股票交易正常秩序的异常交易行为，已依规对相关投资者采取暂停账户交易等自律监管措施。这场狂欢才告一段落。　　但若将视线转向业绩层面，爱丽家居近年来的日子并不好过。　　2022年，公司一度陷入亏损境地，此后有所好转。到了2025年，公司实现营业收入11.27亿元，同比下降13.93%；归属于母公司所有者的净利润仅1717.77万元，同比暴跌87.55%。

三 | 　　2026年一季度，情况进一步恶化，爱丽家居归属于母公司所有者的净利润亏损1482.77万元，同比下降166.88%；公司经营活动产生的现金流量净额为-4048.25万元。7月中旬披露的半年度业绩预告更加不乐观。

四 | 　　虽然爱丽家居称，上半年业绩预亏是受到国际贸易环境持续趋紧及关税政策等影响，但对于这家地板商而言，寻找第二条增长曲线，已成为关乎生存的必答题。　　一场精心策划的跨界豪赌　　跨界方向那么多，为什么爱丽家居偏偏挑中了半导体？这源于AI革命下，大模型训练和推理对存储芯片需求的爆发式增长。　　公开资料显示，欧康诺成立于2005年，是国内配套做HDD机械硬盘可靠性测试并实现量产的企业，为存储器原厂、头部互联网企业、整机厂、品牌厂等国内外客户提供自主研发的一站式存储器测试系统和产品测试服务。　　从交易细节来看，此次收购设计颇为精巧。爱丽家居以现金方式收购欧康诺不低于77.08%的股权。与此同时，爱丽家居控股股东张家港博华企业管理有限公司向欧康诺实控人赵铭及其一致行动人协议转让爱丽家居20%股份。　　一买一卖之间，欧康诺的团队不仅拿到了现金，还成了上市公司重要股东，爱丽家居则顺利跨界科技。不过，围绕这场交易，还有很多疑点，并受到上交所关注。　　上交所发布的监管工作函显示，欧康诺2025年全年净利润仅610.68万元，但到了2026年上半年，净利润飙升至3719.67万元，半年时间挣了去年净利润的约6倍。虽然回复中提到，是因研发费用摊薄、BIST测试设备出货较多等，但也因这次业绩爆发，标的估值跃升至本次交易的不超过6.5亿元。爱丽家居回复公告截图。　　另外，据爱丽家居披露，在尽职调查过程中，公司关注到欧康诺及其实际控制人赵铭，与欧康诺前研发负责人王骁之间，就登记在赵铭名下的欧康诺155万股股份(约占欧康诺目前总股本的7.72%)存在纠纷。虽然爱丽家居声称，相关争议不存在可能导致交易终止的重大不利影响，但也横生波澜。　　在风险控制上，爱丽家居虽设置了四年累计不低于2.3亿元的业绩承诺、现金补偿及减值补偿安排。但欧康诺上半年单一客户收入占比高达84.08%，若客户需求发生变化，或者存储行业景气度出现逆转，公司利润波动将非常剧烈。