速度与激情8
NZ’s push for joint statement on China missile test falls flat amid growing Pacific Islands autonomy_我的网站
一 |
As foreign ministers and senior representatives from Pacific nations convened in Suva for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) to discuss key regional issues, New Zealand's foreign minister reportedly pushed to secure a joint statement condemning China's missile tests in July, however, his effort ultimately fell flat. A Chinese expert described the outcome as a clear rebuke to Canberra and Wellington's ingrained habit of speaking for the Pacific, saying the two countries must come to terms with a shifting reality: Pacific Island states are increasingly unwilling to let Australia and New Zealand dictate who their friends, foes and perceived security threats should be.
Pacific Island foreign ministers failed to agree on Friday to a joint response to China's missile launch in July, with further discussions expected at the Pacific leaders meeting at the end of August, said New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters, according to Reuters.
According to a report from Radio New Zealand, there has not been a unanimous statement from Pacific nations about China's test-launch in July, and Peters said New Zealand had been pushing for one. Peters claimed that the Pacific missed an opportunity not to issue a joint statement soon after China's launch.
Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said before the meeting that she hoped China took note of the "very clear response" already sent from the Pacific about the test, according to AFP.
Peters' push for a joint PIF statement on China's missile tests, together with Wong's remarks, are less about technical security concerns than an effort to turn their own anxieties about China into a regional agenda and pressure Beijing under the forum's collective banner. His description of Pacific Island countries' refusal to single out China as a "missed opportunity" also reveals little respect for their independent judgment, Chen Hong, director of the New Zealand Studies Centre, East China Normal University, told the Global Times.
The result is a clear rebuke to Canberra and Wellington's long-standing habit of arrogantly "speaking for" the Pacific, as island states are increasingly unwilling to let Australia and New Zealand decide who their friends, foes or security threats should be, said Chen Hong.
The Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy said on July 6 that one of its strategic nuclear submarines successfully launched a strategic missile toward relevant high seas of the Pacific Ocean, which landed precisely within the designated waters. China notified relevant countries in advance of the test launch, a move that demonstrates the openness and transparency of the Chinese armed forces, Chen Xi, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense, said at a press conference on July 7.
Chen Hong also noted that Peters' recent China-related rhetoric has become increasingly populist and hawkish as elections approach in New Zealand. "Such an approach risks undermining New Zealand's long-standing reputation for pragmatic, independent, and rational diplomacy," Chen Hong said.
In July, during a parliamentary debate on New Zealand's Covid-19 pandemic response, Peters, who is also leader of the populist New Zealand First party, told a Chinese-born lawmaker to "go back to your own country" while mocking his English proficiency. His remarks drew wide criticism in New Zealand.
Yet Australia and New Zealand continued to amplify missile-related issues and great-power rivalry, pushing the "China threat" narrative to the center of the regional agenda while sidelining the priorities that matter most to Pacific Island nations, said Chinese analysts.
Chen Hong noted that for island states, the most urgent concerns are not geopolitical competition but everyday challenges: climate change, energy security, development financing, infrastructure and economic resilience. By shifting the focus from these concerns to strategic rivalry among major powers, Australia and New Zealand risk distorting the region's real priorities and undermining the aspirations of Pacific Island countries.
According to an introduction on the forum website, "The Forum's Pacific Vision is for a resilient region of peace, harmony, security, social inclusion and prosperity, so that all Pacific people can lead free, healthy, and productive lives."
At the opening of the meeting, Rick Houenipwela, foreign minister of the Solomon Islands and chair of the meeting, said that the Pacific's agenda must continue to be "conceived by the Pacific, shaped by the Pacific and only by the Pacific," according to Reuters.
Chen Hong said Pacific Island nations have made their position clear: differences with China do not mean signing up to the strategic agendas of Australia and New Zealand. A growing number of island countries refuse to be trapped in the black-and-white binary choice of siding with either China or the West.
If Canberra and Wellington keep pushing rhetoric beyond the regional consensus, they risk undermining the very institution they claim to support. The PIF's strength lies not in issuing confrontational statements, but in preserving Pacific unity. Turning that consensus into a tool for pressuring China would erode the forum's cohesion and weaken its central role in the region, said Chen Hong.
。
二 | 炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 來源：银瑞社 文/瑞财经 许淑敏 过去的半年，招商证券有一个最重要的变化—— 董事长从霍达变更为朱江涛。 新官上任三把火，伴随着朱江涛到任，招商证券管理层开始频繁调整。 从2026年4月-8月，招商证券董高变动高达13次。其中，6名董高离任，占2025年初董高总人数的30%。 招商证券管理层，迎来一轮大洗牌。 除了董事长的变更，还有非执行董事刘振华、李晓霏、李德林的离开，职工董事马小利、董秘刘杰离任。 最新的安排显示，招商证券聘任马小利为董事会秘书。 据称，马小利是招商证券的“老将”具有良好的职业道德和个人品德，具备财务会计相关工作经验。他自2024年11月起任招商证券办公室总经理，2025年12月至2026年8月任职工代表董事。 招商证券的管理层调整，仍未完待续。当下，招商证券总裁一职空悬，仍由朱江涛代为履行总裁职责。 人事变动之下，招商证券管理层薪酬上涨了。
三 | 截至2026年6月30日止6个月期间，招商证券关键管理人员报酬为738.79万元，较上年同期的498.19万元上涨了48.29%。 薪酬上涨的背后，是招商证券业绩大爆发。 2026年上半年，招商证券实现营业收入219.02亿元、归母净利润106.24亿元，分别同比增长108.19%、104.87%。
四 | 同时，资产规模也不断走高。
五 | 截至2026年6月末，招商证券资产总额8714.08亿元，较2025年末增加15.65%。 不过，招商证券的净资本下降了。
六 | 截至2026年6月末，招商证券母公司净资本为870.88亿元，较上年末的895.49亿元减少了2.75%。 业绩高增之下，是招商证券营收结构的变化。
七 | 招商证券近乎过半营收，来自于投资及交易业务。 2026年上半年，招商证券投资及交易板块实现营业收入108.91亿元，同比增长325.63%，占总营收49.72%。 而投资及交易业务主要包括权益投资、衍生金融工具的交易和做市、固定收益投资、大宗商品、外汇业务以及另类投资业务等，收益具备一定的不确定性。 至于财富管理和机构业务板块，2025年该业务营收占比一度达到55.36%，但眼下营收占比下滑明显。 2026年上半年，招商证券财富管理和机构业务板块实现营业收入82.58亿元，同比增长39.21%，占比为37.7%。
八 | 业务高增的另一面，则是招商证券营业支出的上涨。
九 | 2026年上半年，招商证券营业总支出88.63亿元，同比增长83.30%。
十 | 其中，信用减值损失计提2.5亿元，同比增长2.66亿元、增幅达1687.7%，融出资金、买入返售金融资产均有计提。 另外，招商证券业务及管理费为85.26亿元，同比增长78.07%，主要是职工工资增加。 2026年上半年，其实现职工工资为59.56亿元，同比大涨126.38%。 但从员工总数来看，招商证券正在减员。
十一 | 截至2026年上半年，招商证券在职员工12767人，较上年末12792人减少了25人。 若以职工工资粗略折算，2026年上半年，招商证券员工人均工资约为46.6万元。责任编辑：杨红卜。
Current article:http://www.roubutianquegumaigoubingdian.cyou/news/20260826_935275.xls
Published on:02:08:14
